Posted December 23, 2009
Steve Rubel wrote:
The decade is coming to an end. And with it, so has the era of feeds too faded -
though you can argue it never got off the ground. Even with real-time
technologies like pubsubhubbub, RSS today feels slow and it's clear its best
days are behind it. Feed reading, like blogging, feels "very 2005." I wasn't
convinced until recently, however.
You could say that I'm not convinced yet, either. Still I wouldn't know what I
would do without RSS.
It seems a lot of out technologies are only useful for people who use a
computer all the time. A person who isn't sitting behind his computer will have
hard time writing tweets. Yes, you can use a fancy phone, that lets you write a
tweet. But not everyone has that kind of phone.
The same problem happens with feeds. I read a lot of blogs, but most people I
know will just go the website to read the stuff they care about. In that same
place they can also interact with the community, by adding comments or liking
and sharing posts. This is harder (or impossible) with RSS.
About a month ago
people were
talking about "pushing RSS down the stack". I would say that there is more of an
opportunity in building applications and services on top of RSS. And again on
top of those applications and services. RSS is and always was a protocol on top
of HTTP.
There is room for creating applications that will help and you read your feeds.
We need a better way of creating conversations outside of it. We need a
protocol for writing and reading comments, liking and sharing posts inside RSS,
that is about as simple as RSS itself is. Link to the comment form of the
article and let applications post comments in a programmatic way using REST.
The same could be done with liking.
Advertisement: Stuifzand Webwinkels - Begin je eigen webwinkel.
Posted December 23, 2009
I have had an account with Twitter now, for almost three
years. According to When did you join
twitter?, I joined
twitter over two years and nine months ago. Lately I'm wondering if it's
useful for anything. It's a lousy news reader, it's a terrible communication
medium and the mechanics are all in one company.
There is no way for me to send messages to the people I would like to send
messages. Let's say this is the same group of people that I would send SMS
messages to. These aren't on Twitter and probably never will be. They tried it
and left it, never to return. These are the kind of people that don't have
fancy phones, with fancy apps, that allow them to use Twitter in a useful way.
Another thing is that Twitter is not private enough for these people. They don't
care about sharing there personal life on a website, that can be read by anybody.
For many messages (or conversations) 140 characters is just not enough. I don't
want to edit my messages until it fits, or split it over multiple messages. I
want to write what I need and send it. I should be able to make the message as
long as it needs to be.
It feels like such a waste to write posts like this, but it's how I feel about
Twitter at the moment. I just don't care about it.
UPDATE: And as you can read, I also don't care about writing a good post.
Posted November 15, 2006
For the last few months I was using Plagger to read RSS feeds. These feeds
would be downloaded and send as e-mail to my gmail account. There was not a lot
wrong with this. But as always there was a better way.
A few days ago I changed Plagger to check twice a
day. Once around 9:00 when I arrive at work and once at around 19:00, which is
when I'm back home and sitting behind my computer.
This change leaves a lot a time for actual work and have at least a bit to
read.
Posted July 16, 2006
While I was reading the Perl planet I found a link to
a project called Plagger. It's system for creating,
changing and publishing feeds.
To create a new 'program', you need to make a config file. The example
directory includes a bloglines2gmail config and a config for a 'planet'
aggregator. Both are less than twenty lines of configuration. It's really easy
to create your own feeds with this.
Be sure to check out the presentations on the website, for an explaination of
Plagger (the documentation is a bit light).
Posted January 4, 2006
One of the problems with feeds (RSS, Atom, or something) is that most of the
explaination is about XML and the technology behind it and not about the
problem it solves.
I would be better if explanations about feeds wouldn't talk about XML or other
technology parts, when explaining it to users.
Posted June 26, 2005
At lifehacker I came across this incredible tool for del.icio.us. It is called the del.icio.us Direc.tor. It a combination of webapp and del.icio.us API and Ajax.
This probably is one of the steps were going to see on the web, web applications that are written over webbased apis. Web based tools with nice user friendly clean interfaces that do something that's different enough from the actual data provider website.
Very impressive. We need more of this.
Posted October 18, 2004
At my school we now have to use a webmail client. And I don't like
it. Because it is a lot of work to open up the page, enter a password,
look over the messages and find nothing new.
I use Liferea as my RSS Feed Reader and it now uses a program to get a feed of the messages. The program downloads the webpage with the messages and then generates a simple rss2.0 feed from that.
If I have cleaned up the sourcecode I will put it on my webpage as
free software. This will solve some real problems some students have
with the e-mail. It will at least solve some of the problems.
Posted September 28, 2004
After some bugfixing, I now have the permalinks working right. I also
added an RSS2.0 feed. I'm not yet sure if it's the way I like it, or
that's correct. But it's a test so.